Accueil | Qui sommes nous | le Blog de la rédaction | Traduction S'abonner | Nous soutenir  
RSS  
 
 
 La traduction d'Évangile et liberté 

 

En une, le n°259 | Mai 2012
  CAHIER | Rousseau, enfant terrible de Calvin
 
 

 

Evangile et liberté

 

 
  Note précédente - Accueil du blog - Note Suivante13 Avril 2010
When Paul stopped talking about the resurrection of the dead

Traduction, Mardi 13 Avril 2010 à 13:16 - English

By Henri Persoz
Translation Jack McDonald


The resurrection of the dead is the central feature of certain expressions of Christianity, and yet the Gospels speak of it only rarely. Even Paul seems to have changed his mind on the question.
 
The resurrection of Jesus is related in detail in the Gospels, but details of the resurrection of other people are much more vague. The Gospels often speak of the Kingdom of God and of eternal life, but the general resurrection of the dead is handled episodically and without detail – we hear of Lazarus and of Jairus’ daughter being raised from the dead; but they subsequently die again like everyone else and their stories do not really cast much light on the resurrection of the dead. Belief in the resurrection of the dead is not central to the teaching of Jesus.

This lack of attention in the Gospels to the resurrection of the dead does not apply to Paul’s letters, at least not to those he wrote first. Indeed, in his first letter to the Thessalonians, Paul speaks of it with firm assurance (1 Thess 5. 15-18), announcing a resurrection with the sound of God’s trumpet, with Christ descending from heaven and coming to meet the living and the dead, in the style of contemporary Greek kings who visited their cities with fine pomp.

But just three or four years later, in his first letter to the Corinthians, Paul is less precise about the detail of the events surrounding the resurrection of the dead; he develops instead the meaning of the events: he underlines (1 Cor 15. 12-19) that Christ cannot be risen without a general resurrection of the dead. This was far from self-evident for his readership in Corinth. Later on in the same chapter (1 Cor 15. 35-56), he explains what he means by resurrection, “As the plant which grows is completely different from the seed from which it sprouts, so it is with our body: sown as animal, it will rise spiritual; sown as corruptible, it will rise incorruptible, sown weak, it will rise with power.” This passage is one of the richest and most enduring in the New Testament concerning the resurrection.

Another three or four years later, Paul writes his letter to the Romans, a fine synthesis of his thought, a letter written to a theological plan, a masterpiece close to every Protestant heart. But curiously, Paul speaks hardly at all about the resurrection of the dead: throughout the entire letter, it is now Jesus alone who is risen. Of course, human beings retain the possibility of being saved, “You have been saved, but in hope” (Rom 8. 24). In addition, Paul speaks often of a sort of true life, a new life; he evokes the “justification which gives life.”

But what exactly do this salvation and this new life consist of? The beginning of chapter 6 enlightens us. We can summarise it as follows, “Through baptism, we are dead and buried with Christ. But since he is risen, we lead a new life with him. Having been absorbed into his death, so we are absorbed into his resurrection. We should therefore see ourselves as dead to sin and alive to God. We are living beings returned from among the dead, so that we can offer ourselves to God’s service.”

We therefore have to pass through death during our own lifetime, as it were, in order to live to God ever after – we might even say (albeit that Paul does not employ the term) in order to be raised to God ever after. This idea was already current with Paul in his first letter to the Corinthians when he wrote, “What you sow only comes to life if it dies.”

We can now begin to understand Paul’s position: new life and salvation are a personal offering on our part, an acceptance of our death, just as Jesus accepted his death. This offering allows us to bounce back for the rest of our lives and to consecrate ourselves to God’s work – nothing else has any purchase on us, since we are already dead and already risen.

This is a profound interpretation of resurrection. It shows a real and reasonable evolution in Paul’s thought: new life begins when we finally consider ourselves dead and buried. With Christ.

Here Paul is pure genius!
 

Ajouter un commentaire :
 
Pseudo :
Votre texte :
Question anti-spam :
 
 
 Evangile et liberté in english
Evangile et liberté en español
Evangile et liberté in italiano
 
 
CATÉGORIES
Italiano
Español
English
LES NOTES PAR DATES
Mai 2012 (7)
Avril 2012 (14)
Mars 2012 (11)
Février 2012 (13)
Janvier 2012 (12)
Décembre 2011 (16)
Novembre 2011 (13)
Octobre 2011 (12)
Septembre 2011 (12)
Juillet 2011 (6)
Juin 2011 (5)
Mai 2011 (7)
Avril 2011 (7)
Mars 2011 (12)
Février 2011 (8)
Janvier 2011 (11)
Décembre 2010 (10)
Novembre 2010 (6)
Octobre 2010 (9)
Septembre 2010 (6)
Août 2010 (2)
Juillet 2010 (2)
Juin 2010 (3)
Mai 2010 (3)
Avril 2010 (3)
Mars 2010 (4)
LES LIENS DU BLOG
Riforma.it
 
 

 

LES NOTES RÉCENTES

Preguntas de los lectores

La preghiera che disturba

Quello che mi permette di avvenire al mondo

Cambiare il mondo

Una hora de Gracia

Charter of the Protestant Church San sebastian de los Reyes (Madrid)

Youth Creed

Il bastian contrario : “Che tutti siano uno”

I testi apocrifi, riflesso delle prime comunità cristiane

La resurrezione di Cristo


 
2012 © Évangile et Liberté